Would You Rather: Have Cold Showers For Life Or Never Get To Drive A Car Above 2.0 Litres?

Would you settle for a life of disappointing showers if it meant you could drive any engine size you wanted, or would you limit your life to 2.0 litres to crank up the water heat?

Sponsored Posts

Comments

Nissan 420sx

Can’t see it in the app:/

01/07/2016 - 17:12 |
0 | 0
Walter Staley

Never said anything about normal baths

01/07/2016 - 17:13 |
0 | 0
Dom

Who needs more than 2L!

01/07/2016 - 17:14 |
31 | 1
Anonymous

2.0 is fine with me

01/07/2016 - 17:14 |
0 | 0
Jared Steinbach

Well I need all cars so cold showers and awesome cars it is then

01/07/2016 - 17:16 |
0 | 0
Jared Steinbach

Plus I run a 2.3L in my Ranger and I ain’t given up my car or others for anything

01/07/2016 - 17:16 |
0 | 0
NyteetyN

I think Golf R 2.0 TSI would be enough good for me.

01/07/2016 - 17:18 |
0 | 0
Ben F. (Slowmaro)

Cold showers are beneficial even if they suck. Sub 2.0L engines are not beneficial and suck. Rather have 1 suck than 2 suck.

I am not biased. I swear.

01/07/2016 - 17:21 |
0 | 0
Thomas B

You can have all the fun or fuel economy you want with B204 Saab engines.

01/07/2016 - 17:21 |
0 | 0
Boosted Beaters

EVO’s and hot showers sound like the kindda life i’d like.

01/07/2016 - 17:21 |
0 | 0