7 Features That Aren't Standard On Cars But Should Be

We asked you what features aren't standard on all cars but should be, and the answers ranged from the sensible to the hilarious! Here are our favourites...
7 Features That Aren't Standard On Cars But Should Be

1. Don't text and drive

7 Features That Aren't Standard On Cars But Should Be

An EMP device that shuts down all wireless connections in the area. No more texting and driving. - Turbo Toddler

2. Pop-ups FTW!

7 Features That Aren't Standard On Cars But Should Be

Pop. Up. Headlights. - On The Apex

3. Save the manuals

7 Features That Aren't Standard On Cars But Should Be

Manual gearbox!!! - Benjavick

4. LSD should be mandatory

7 Features That Aren't Standard On Cars But Should Be

LSD…and not the drug. That has saved me from getting swallowed whole by snow. - Matticus Finch

5. Not safe, but very convenient

7 Features That Aren't Standard On Cars But Should Be

A microwave so I can make my food in the car and don’t have to rush out the door all the time after waiting for my food to heat up. - Mike Hummel

6. Anti-nag feature

7 Features That Aren't Standard On Cars But Should Be

A button to turn off all the nag features...like hill assist, traction control, ABS, smart cruise control, lane departure sensors, backup camera. - ManInDboX

7. For when you really don't want to stop

7 Features That Aren't Standard On Cars But Should Be

An in car toilet. - Speedemon

Check out everyone’s suggestions here!

Sponsored Posts

Comments

.... 3

Dislock, duh?

03/14/2016 - 19:51 |
11 | 2
Anonymous

Can you send me that gif

03/14/2016 - 19:59 |
0 | 0
DeLeon

Why would you want to turn ABS off ?? You would need longer distance to brake in extreme conditions.

03/14/2016 - 20:06 |
1 | 0
Anonymous

For #6 (Anti-Nag Feature) add girlfriend to that list

03/14/2016 - 20:09 |
8 | 0
boss390

Because a manual S-Class/Maybach/Eldorado would make so much sense…

03/14/2016 - 20:13 |
0 | 0
Anonymous

Number 1 would be bad in event of a crash and annoying for passengers

03/14/2016 - 20:14 |
1 | 0
Anonymous

There was a guy who had a cell jammer in his car for #1, I think he went to jail for like 5 years or so. #1 is never gonna be a thing because it’s a federal offense to block cell signals I think

03/14/2016 - 20:15 |
3 | 0
CitigoMan

how bout you adding your sub human passenger to the anti nag deactivation feature?

03/14/2016 - 20:24 |
2 | 0
Kaleb Penuel

First one is stupid because passengers would like to use their phones

03/14/2016 - 20:26 |
2 | 0
TheGIFMan 1

Even clarkson still likes manual

03/14/2016 - 20:31 |
13 | 0

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Get the latest car news, reviews and unmissable promotions from the team direct to your inbox