Ford Mustang Records Shock Two-Star Euro NCAP Safety Score

As Euro NCAP catches up with tests on models it has so far missed out, the Mustang has thrown up a complete surprise with the lowest score from a mainstream car maker in nine years
Ford Mustang Records Shock Two-Star Euro NCAP Safety Score

The Ford Mustang has been given a totally unexpected two-star safety rating by Euro NCAP. It’s the first car from a major manufacturer to score so low for almost a decade, and it’s not ideal for something that’s not that likely to make it to the end of its life without being crashed at least once.

The punishing Euro NCAP tests showed up major issues with airbags not protecting occupants properly, rear passengers slipping beneath seat belts and a lack of active safety technology like autonomous braking systems.

For comparison, the Dacia Sandero scored four of out five stars. In 2013.

Ford Mustang Records Shock Two-Star Euro NCAP Safety Score

In the frontal offset impact test, neither of the front airbags inflated enough to fully protect the occupants, and in the side impact test the ‘10-year-old’ dummy’s head actually squashed right through the under-inflated curtain airbag and hit the door trim.

Thatcham Research’s Director of Research, Matthew Avery, even went as far as to say that the test result “makes it unsuitable for carrying rear passengers.”

“On top this, it does not have basic life-saving technology like Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) that is available even on the Ford Fiesta, and the recently launched Ford Edge,” he said.

Ford has countered with assertions that the facelifted model, to be released in Europe later this year, will score higher. The newer model will have pre-collision assist and lane-keeping assist as standard.

If you already own one, though, you might want to avoid driving into anything solid.

Sponsored Posts

Comments

Anonymous

And hitting crowds wasn’t a consideration in this rating?

01/25/2017 - 11:43 |
4 | 5
Anonymous

“Don’t drive into anything solid.” Good advice.

01/25/2017 - 11:57 |
10 | 1
Anonymous

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

Solid-No
Pedestrians-?

01/27/2017 - 23:13 |
0 | 0
Too Marmite

The crowds may come out better than the car (Uses over used joke)

01/25/2017 - 12:03 |
3 | 6
Anonymous

doesnt really matter since crowds are generally soft, external airbags if you will

01/25/2017 - 12:10 |
3 | 4
Noimagination

Am I the only one that thinks the requirement for auto braking is complete garbage? Most cars I’ve seen that have it only work up to about 30-40 km/h. Hardly ‘life-saving’.

01/25/2017 - 12:39 |
34 | 1

Not true at all. It is at these sort of speeds you’re most likely to hit a car in stop/start traffic or a pedestrian, not wile doing 70km/h +.

01/25/2017 - 13:39 |
3 | 3

Not to mention that it’s often available only on models with an auto box.

01/25/2017 - 14:04 |
4 | 1
Anonymous

They don’t need safety rating as the only things they hot are people and kerbs which they get an impressive 5*.

01/25/2017 - 13:09 |
2 | 4
Anonymous

They don’t need a safety rating as they only hit people and kerbs which they get an impressive 5*

01/25/2017 - 13:10 |
2 | 5
JDM814783648923482374

The crash tests are so unrealistic, it should be wether the car survives a crash into a crowd not into a wall.

01/25/2017 - 13:13 |
2 | 4
Anonymous

Another shining example of American car quality lol.

01/25/2017 - 13:14 |
1 | 3
Ben Anderson 1

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

The car actually gets 4-stars on passenger safety on Euro NCAP. The reason why its two stars is because there isn’t an option to buy extra electronic safety system. That’s it. The car is actually perfectly safe.

01/25/2017 - 18:17 |
0 | 0