Fuel Prices Are About To Surge, Yet Americans Continue To Buy Trucks In Record Numbers
The year was 2008. I was working in a call center in Southeast Michigan helping auto insurance adjusters figure out how much wrecked cars were worth. I’d recently left a position working with the performance division at Ford because, well, everyone was leaving. The way things were going with all the auto companies at that time, I figured switching to the insurance side would be recession-proof. After all, no matter how bad things get, people still crash. Right?
Long story short, it wasn’t recession-proof. But I did survive the auto industry collapse and global financial meltdown living just 40 miles from ground zero - AKA Detroit, Michigan. I was lucky; in that part of the country there were business executives with 20 years of experience and multiple college degrees fighting for jobs at Wal-Mart. Engineers who could rewire the International Space Station couldn’t get jobs flipping burgers at McDonalds.
Many of them were also saddled with pickup trucks or massive luxury SUVs.
I’m not against such vehicles, and with a rather inefficient V8 car sitting in my garage right now, I’d be a gigantic hypocrite if I said people shouldn’t buy them. But my Mustang isn’t a daily driver, and at 1/20th the cost of that GMC Yukon, I can easily afford something else that’s a bit more frugal. Most truck and SUV buyers don’t take that extra step; they look for the snazziest model they can afford and plunge into it without considering what would happen if petrol prices double or triple.
The bigger-is-better mentality with nary a concern for economy in this day and age is where I facepalm, because we should’ve learned a serious lesson by now. This is how so many people lost their shirts a few years back, not to mention their vehicles and homes. And it’s how General Motors - once the largest auto manufacturer in the world - went bankrupt.
And my spider sense tells me it’ll be happening again, in the not-so-distant future. More on that in a moment.
I know - us Americans are crybabies when it comes to petrol because Europe pays far more than we do. Europe also has a wide range of vehicles that do 50mpg, whereas we are still stuck in the 30mpg range, save for a few hybrids. It all balances out, but more importantly, Europeans buy those efficient diesel hatchbacks because most are pretty decent cars, and you know, they don’t want to spend all of their money on petrol driving to the pub.
Here in the States, when petrol topped $4.00 a gallon many people didn’t get that memo. They kept right on driving their 15mpg pickup trucks to the pub, to work, to the mall, anywhere they wanted to go until their bank accounts and credit cards literally disintegrated. Once they realised something needed to change it was too late. People were broke, and because their trucks drank more fuel than a Eurofighter in full afterburner, they were virtually worthless.
I clearly remember talking to an auto insurance adjuster during my time at the call center. It was September 2008 and Hurricane Ike had just hit the Texas gulf coast. The adjuster had several total loss claims from the area; people couldn’t afford to drive their pickups and SUVs, nor could they sell them because nobody wanted to buy them. So they just drove them to the beach before the storm hit, and let Ike’s storm surge do the rest. They failed to realise insurance payouts were based on current values anyway, so I suspect many people were still left owing money on vehicles they no longer had.
Today, pickup trucks and SUVs in the US have grown bigger than ever, and American buyers are right back to soaking them up. And it’s not as if they suddenly became fuel misers either - despite hype from manufacturers about “60 percent better fuel economy” they all still suck. Literally. A 2016 GMC Yukon still gets 16mpg. The best pickups or big SUVs might reach 20.
Americans bought a record 17.4 million cars last year, eclipsing the previous record set in 2000. So far this year overall sales are down by roughly eight percent, but large SUVs, crossovers and pickup truck sales are actually up quite a bit. Petrol in the States has been between $2.00 and $2.50 for most of the year, which is certainly encouraging people to go right back to loving their big, thirsty, do-all workhorses.
I can’t fault manufacturers for building the vehicles people want to buy, nor can I call out people for making purchases from the heart. If you want a big pickup and can afford it, do it. I won’t lie - pickups and SUVs are pretty damn nice these days. But you better have a plan when (yes when) energy prices go back into the stratosphere. Because that new 18mpg off-roader that never goes off-road will get crazy expensive quicker than you can say government bailout.
Oh how quickly people forget, but if petrol prices double in the next couple years - and I believe they will - people will quickly and tragically remember. How do I know this will happen? Well, let’s take a look at current events.
OPEC just announced a cut in oil production, the first such deal since 2008. Prior to that, US auto sales had been strong - record-level strong - led by pickup trucks and SUVs taking advantage of low petrol prices in the States.
Maybe I’m being pessimistic. Maybe this time the crash won’t be quite so bad. The auto market in the US is more diverse with small, efficient alternatives to trucks and big SUVs that are legitimately good. And since 2008 there’s been quite an expansion in shale oil production in the States, and when oil tops $50 a barrel that production will likely ramp back up. Maybe people will be smarter this time. Maybe there won’t be another crash at all.
Or maybe in a couple years we’ll see more Yukons, F-150s and Durangos parked along the Southern U.S. coastline, waiting for the storm surge to roll in.
Comments
You beat me to it xD
Yep
Basically xD
This guy’s hair tho… As crazy as his ideas.
Just get a Prius or a Tesla…
Please tell me you know how unenvironmentally friendly the Prius is made. Not to mention the way to make a sufficient amount of electricity is by burning coal and similar substances. How many times do I have to say it?
Hydrogen is the fuel of the future.
[DELETED]
Same
Why don’t they buy a Bentley Bentayga Diesel, it’s big and fuel efficient.
Yeah, it is a much better choice. Cheap, big load room, American, it is the perfect truck.
Because it costs over six figures, not everyone has that kind of money to spend on a car.
Whats the point of using an EcoBoost V6 if it achieves only 16mpg?…
I mean if you don’t care about mpg why not use a 6-litre V8 with same fuel economy
Or if you do care about mpg than clearly EcoBoost V6 isn’t performing that well
America has only recently started to really play around with turbocharged engines, so the V8’s are close to their peak performance while the turbo engines are just getting started/
The downvotes though :D sorry ecoboost fans!
For Brits making snarky comments, this means we will probably end up paying three quid a gallon through the summer instead of two pounds and thirty pence.
How much is petrol in the UK at the moment?
Now, feel free to carrying on mocking Americans driving vehicles with huge engines on a a site for automotive enthusiasts…
Where I live it’s about the same for both petrol AND diesel, the average is around £1.08 per litre
True story. I’m paying $2.35ish per gallon for premium at the moment. That’s what… £1.60?
Different economies, mate. Just going by the exchange rate is a pretty rookie mistake. A small hike in fuel prices wont be an inconvenience for us like it was during the recession but it’ll be disastrous for America.
The Fuel Economy of the cars in the states isn’t the problem - the problem is that someone earning a wage in GB£ has more disposable income in the UK vs someone earning a wage in US$ living in the USA.
Average wage for both countries is 27k (£27,000 and $27,000) and average payments for items in the UK are lower. £580 average mortgage vs $1300 average mortgage, £0 healthcare per month vs average $280 per month, to use two examples of many.
(I was deciding to move to the USA last year when my job outlook was looking grim - decided against it as you can probably guess).
Taking the words right out of my mouth.
In Canada it’s been 4 bucks a gallon for the last 10 years it seems
I agree that it will probably happen again in the near future. But I think manufacturers are prepared if and when it does happen. Now we have plenty of hybrid technology to go around, and all it would take to start using that technology is for gas to get expensive again. (Seriously how hard would it be to throw a big battery pack in the floor of a truck or SUV?) Plus, Fords 2.3 ecoboost is making more power and torque than the v8’s of 20 years ago. I’m not saying people would buy a four cylinder F-150, but the prion is there nonetheless.
Option*
All the rednecks and just normal people who have trucks here in america arent going to trade in their trucks for prius’s because the gas prices are going up a bit. And all the people that dont drive stick here in america arent going to want to learn because one truck offers only manual. And finally, mustangs will never stop driving through crowds even if it has automatic brakes. And do you know why?. . . . .
Because life finds a way.
Great read Chris
Some people can actually afford to drive around a truck everyday, even if the fuel prices increase.
Key point: some people. A lot of people think they can, only few actually can.
And A lot of people use their truck for work. If things get tough. They can also start scrapping metal
In Hillary’s America, Petrol prices will soar sky high… In Trump’s America, they might go up slightly but not significantly.
Im not trying to get into a political debate, its just facts that Hillary wants clean energy but Trump just wants to improve the economy in any way possible.
I hate to be that hippie guy, but if america doesn’t start adopting greener energy your sea levels will also soar sky high. Bye bye Miami that means… So wouldn’t it be better to just drive normal sedans or wagons like the rest of the world and endure short-term higher fuel prices instead of long-term sinking cities?
That’s not meant to be any form of attack to you or your comment, but just something I miss in this discussion, which is only about fuel cost and not about CO2 impact.
On behalf of Americanfcjk