Noise Is Now The Only Reason To Cling Onto Internal Combustion
There’s nothing quite like the organic noise of a wonderful petrol engine. Whether your dish du jour is a woofly twin-turbo V8, a furious N/A V10 or a melodious, soulful V12 – or any one of a dozen different particularly sonorous engine configurations – nothing can replace the sound of your favourite engines under load.
My hand is up; I’m guilty as charged. At CT we do like to make a fuss about that. From the 4.7-litre Maserati V8 in the old GranCabrio to today’s bombastic blown 4.0-litre AMG flagship, I’ve not been shy about placing noise as the one reason why EVs can’t replace petrol-driven sports cars.
And yet… even to we most die-hard supporters of good ol’ suck-squeeze-bang-blow, the list of arguments in favour of turning liquidised ancient dead things into forward motion is growing bum-troublingly thin.
Earlier this week we reported on how the Volkswagen ID R completed its bonkers 6m 05s lap of the Green Hell at an energy usage equivalent of 17mpg; about the same as what an M3 will give you on a quick blast to and from the shops. The more you think about it, the more amazing it becomes.
For a car as rampantly quick as the ID R to make a circuit of such a fuel-hungry track using so relatively little energy is a brutal uppercut to the jaw of internal combustion. All of a sudden we’re reaching a technological event horizon whereby electric power can give more real-world speed, with better refinement, in a way that’s (on the face of it) much kinder to the planet. Not just that, though: the key buzzword of the 2010s has been efficiency, and in that respect the ID R represents a quantum leap.
Let’s take a flight of fancy: imagine owning a car that would hit 62mph in around 5.5 seconds, carry you to work in near-silent comfort, be kinder to the planet and achieve a financial equivalent of 100mpg or more. Now realise that the Tesla Model 3 already offers that. Such a combination is going to be prohibitively expensive for most of us for the time being, but when the classifieds start to fill up with BEVs in a few years… well, could you really resist?
No manufacturer has yet come up with a solution to the noise issue; or lack thereof. Formula E still sounds about as exciting as a wholemeal loaf, and to anyone for whom emotive noise is an integral part of the way they enjoy cars, it’s still a gaping hole in the new kids’ arsenals. But prices are creeping down, and now that BEVs can offer so much of everything else, for how long can we realistically clutch at that one remaining straw?
Comments
i mean, until someone manages to design a trick manual gearbox for electric cars (ZF already has a 2-speed automatic coming), or even just make electric cars lighter and more agile
i wouldn’t even care about sound
The technology still isn’t ready.
They keep using lithium batteries, look at the latest motoE incident where a bike caught fire, it already happened and all the bikes where involved, the championship almosto got cancelled.
Also an i8 caught fire in a dealer, lots of teslas did, i3 and hyundai kona did too, the kona wasn’t even connected to anything.
Electric cars are dangerous, there are better technologies but they’re not ready like solid state batteries.
Until then I won’t consider an EV because I don’t want to wake up in a burning house.
When the technology is there, I’ll be in. I already want to convert my old Mazda to an EV, but at this stage I’d get half the range from a charge I do from a tank of petrol, and there’s no infrastructure for it in Australia.
yes and lack of tactility. but i don’t really need a reason, i just like it. also car culture is rooted in ice so we’ve been conditioned to it. I also don’t like or trust too much tech, whether its a washing machine or a car. Performance modding is going to be boring as well
The only reason? Really? The life expectancy of a Tesla’s batteries is 2 years… 2! Now I’m sorry, but that isn’t exactly progress. Especially when a fuel tank on a modern car will last the life time of the vehicle. Petrol still has a long way to go. Battery electric cars will be short lived…
We can use Biofuel which is a 0 emissions fuel for ICE.So there is a reason to defend them.Another reason to defend them is the fact that ICE is being scapegoated so the farming industry doesn’t have to stop breeding as many cows as they are which would definitely be the biggest cause of CO2 emissions in the atmosphere.
We have at least LMP1 and F1 to prove that hybrids are still faster than fully electric. Even 2004 F1 are faster than any electric cars just with combustion
What about working on your car/diagnosing a problem yourself?
There are more reasons to cling to ICE than just sound. There’s the feeling of the engine characteristics (If you enjoy those sorts of feelings), Working on the engine (again, only if you are into that stuff) and pleasure in general (depends on if you personally derive pleasure from ICE)
In the future I think ICE will become a toy or a hobby for those that still like them.
The range on my wrx isn’t much better than a model 3 lol