Slow Humans Raise Seriously Ironic Safety Concerns Over Autonomous Cars

A fresh study is reporting incredibly slow human reactions when it comes to taking control back from autonomous cars, posing big questions about whether we can be trusted with the technology
Slow Humans Raise Seriously Ironic Safety Concerns Over Autonomous Cars

The surprising length of time it takes the average human to re-take control from an autonomous car has blown the subject of the new technology’s safety wide open.

Autonomous cars can’t yet handle all situations, and sometimes have to ask the human behind the wheel to take charge for a while, sounding and/or flashing a warning that the vehicle is about to relinquish control.

Researchers at the University of Southampton have completed a study that found the median length of time between a test car’s prompt and the human taking over, even when the person in question was focused only on driving, was 4.56 seconds. Ouch.

The study, which used 26 male and female subjects aged between 20 and 52, saw each driver placed in an autonomous vehicle simulator set at 70mph. On the first run the driver focused only on the drive, but then on the second attempt read a newspaper instead.

Slow Humans Raise Seriously Ironic Safety Concerns Over Autonomous Cars

Clearly, 4.56 seconds is more than enough time, if the situation turns critical, to have had a colossal accident before the human ever gets to grips with the situation.

And when the human was absorbed in a newspaper instead of focusing on the road, that median time figure rose to 6.06 seconds. If it was an emergency, the driver could be in trouble before even taking their reading glasses off.

What’s worse, the lowest recorded reaction times in the study were 21 and 26 seconds, and when you translate that into a car stomping completely unguided down the motorway, an accident could be inevitable.

Considering that 70mph is 102 feet per second, even the lowest median reaction time would mean 465ft being covered before any human intervention. Scary? We think so.

Slow Humans Raise Seriously Ironic Safety Concerns Over Autonomous Cars

The conclusion of the research is that 4.5 seconds, or even six seconds, isn’t enough notice to give drivers in order to be fully safe. But how can drivers or passengers possibly expect to be given more advance notice than that before being asked to take the wheel?

It should be interesting to see where this goes, and how the law reflects personal responsibility. If humans in autonomous cars can’t relax and do other things without fearing for their lives, what’s the point at all?

Remote video URL

Source: Autoblog

Sponsored Posts

Comments

Anonymous

Whats next? Outlawing driving? Because in the future no people will be able to actually drive because we are constantly driven by future cars. And the reason for it is that “human driving is not as accurate as a computer”. I know it is true but it opens up an entirely new danger. You could just hack it and control the car remotely. It could be really dangerous especially if that person has bad intent. And if a system update containing a glitch or a mistake gets released, it could risk potentially everyone driving that car model or perhaps even the people who own cars from that brand. Id prefer us individuals controlling our individual cars instead of some system having control of possibly every car from that brand and eventually in existence.

This is why I am pessimistic about the future of the automobile.

01/30/2017 - 11:00 |
66 | 0
Sivert Grande

Did they actually have to complete a study to realise this? Isn’t it obvious?

01/30/2017 - 11:09 |
6 | 2
Anonymous
01/30/2017 - 11:15 |
14 | 2
Deoxide

We all need the reactions like Takumi and Ryosuke!

01/30/2017 - 11:19 |
10 | 0
DL🏁

I’m not surprised, from my experience most drivers on UK road take over 4 seconds to realise that the car in front is braking and so they also need to do so
There isnt even a need for autopilots to prove that most drivers are stupidly slow to react to changing road conditions
Even if they are driving themselves with no autopilot involves

01/30/2017 - 11:24 |
3 | 0
DL🏁

I’m not surprised, from my experience most drivers on UK road take over 4 seconds to realise that the car in front is braking and so they also need to do so
There isnt even a need for autopilots to prove that most drivers are stupidly slow to react to changing road conditions
Even if they are driving themselves with no autopilot involves

01/30/2017 - 11:24 |
5 | 0
Anonymous

Humans are smart enough to create a self driving car but also dumb enough to forget how to use it.

01/30/2017 - 11:29 |
23 | 0
Anonymous

Love the way they said slow humans and then put in pictures of #AlexKersten

01/30/2017 - 13:49 |
21 | 0
Anonymous

If I was in that test I would turn off autonomous driving and drive myself

01/30/2017 - 13:57 |
5 | 1
H5SKB4RU (Returned to CT)

I hope this is enough to ban autonomous cars and remove lazy id*ots of the road

01/30/2017 - 14:13 |
4 | 1

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Get the latest car news, reviews and unmissable promotions from the team direct to your inbox