I'm Tired Of Hearing "Save The Manuals".
I wonder if someone that learned to drive with a Model T ever wrote to a motoring publication with the view:
“Three pedals and one lever is way to easy. I like to feel the man and machine connection by mastering the timing of synchronised movements between my left foot, right hand, left hand and right foot while trying to steer at the same time. It’s no wonder there are so many accidents when you consider people don’t even have to concentrate on driving because they don’t need to alter the air/fuel mixes themselves when changing speeds!”
Now, I’ll grant you that the “move with times you’ll not miss it” point of view is a little obvious and obnoxious. I simply can’t argue against the great joy in controlling the gear box with a fairly simple mechanical connection. I’ve no doubt that there will still be some more analogue cars built around a stick shift for the purist, the playful and those that love the challenge. However we are now in an age where many cars drivetrains are not built around a manual transmission, and that makes for some contradictions being typed into comment boxes across the internet by the hardcore manual gearbox fetishists.
The contradiction is in those people holding onto the idea of stick shift as the be-all and end-all of motoring perfection are also the same people salivating over technologies such torque vectoring and adaptive suspension. These are technologies becoming commonplace that genuinely cause the car to require less skill and understanding to drive at any pace. The computer will dial out to a large degree the pressing need to understand the surface you are on, and dial out oversteer and torque steer for you.
Let’s take the darling of the automotive world at the moment, the Ford Focus RS. If you visit Fords introductory webpage on the car you will find this statement:
“… the Ford Performance All-Wheel-Drive System intelligently distributes power for maximum benefit, both front and rear as well as left and right. “
That’s basically the computer and associated technology controlling the entire dynamics of the cars handling and adapting to the conditions you are driving in, thus removing a fair amount of responsibility of control of the car. The same applies with the simpler pure front wheel drive Focus and Fiesta ST models. All this amazing computer controlled technology is designed to turn the car into a precise handling instrument, yet people want to depress a pedal, move a lever, then release the pedal every time they want the car to change gear. Many want to add a blip of the throttle on the downshift with the same foot that is doing the braking - yet at the same time the computer is deciding when and how much braking to apply on different corners of the car and how much to split the power between the front and rear of the car to keep it stable and maximise grip.
At that point driving a stick shift is nothing but an illusion of control.
Now, I’m down for doing things for fun in a car designed to put a smile upon my face like the ST model Fords, but the disdain shown when any popular car comes out with no stick shift option is most often nothing short of absurd. On top of that it’s inevitably shown by people that haven’t driven the car and were never going to buy a new model in the first place.
At this point I’m sure there are engineers in all over the world absolutely baffled that these amazing cars they have designed to drive and handle beautifully are being slammed in website comment sections because people are demanding an archaic form of control over the gearbox. It must be all kinds of frustrating that instead of the slick paddle controlled masterpiece the entire drivetrain is based around, the loud people want to disengage drive with a foot pedal and remove their hand from the steering wheel to shift a lever around instead.
So where does that leave us?
It actually leaves us in a place where we have cars serious about their performance and looking to give people something exhilarating to drive based on current technology… and it’s getting a bit weird to keep trying to impose a contrivance that is tottering over the brink and into becoming old school technology.
You can follow me here.
#blogpost
Comments
I prefer a manual simply for the pleasure of it. I never really cared about the performance advantage of autos, but I get why they’re standard on high end stuff.
Of course automatics have their place as they reign supreme both on the track and on the commute, which is why I’m worried about the availability of manuals in the future.
You know, before I clicked on this I was going to get mad. Then I read it.
I’ve always been someone who loves manual transmissions and I hate to see that there aren’t many cars around today with them. As much as I hate new technology, some tech controlling the dynamics and handling of cars is very impressive, and I like when the money is invested in those things rather than surround view cameras and automatic brakes.
I believe there is a place for a manual, and there is a place for a newer, faster shifting automatic transmission. In a car like a LaFerrari it makes absolutely no sense to use a manual transmission. With the power levels and the nature of the car all together, there’s just no need for it. It would be too slow to shift and it wouldn’t be nearly as good around the track for that reason. Now a car like an MX-5, a GTI, a Focus ST, or even a Challenger SRT 392, that’s a different story. Those cars aren’t all about track times. They’re about having fun, which is the perfect place for a manual transmission. I don’t want to see the manual disappear, but I’d still like to see it highly available in lower cost sports cars (well, lower cost in comparison to supercars) like the Miata, BR-Z, Genesis Coupe, 370Z, and G37 (Or Q60, whatever it’s called now). Or, say, BMW could have the SMG in the M4, but still offer a manual in the 428i or 435i. Manuals are great for cars with lower power. Who wants an automatic NA Miata?
But like you said, I’m one of those people who wouldn’t be buying new cars anyway. There are plenty of older, cheaper manual cars around for us to buy that have plenty of potential. Manual transmissions have their place, but so do DCTs.
Great post! Sorry if this comment seems very thrown together! Just typing my thought process.
I may get destroyed for saying this, but whenever I play Video Games I use both. You (not the OP) may say, that I don’t know anything about that, because they are “only Videogames”, but Project Cars and Assetto Corsa come pretty close. Sometimes I prefer a DCT over a Manual, especially when the Car is absurdly fast.
Project cars in particular really gets as close to realism as a 2D video game can.
Precisely. Manuals are incredibly fun in situations which are mostly out of the usual daily commute. Driving a stick shift in heavy traffic can be exhausting after a hour or two. So, I can’t blame automakers for making less models with a manual option. Even because very few people buy them (look at the Lamborghini cars for example).
Amen! 10/10, would recommend to a friend 👍🏻👌🏻
Congratulations with this excellent article. I would also like to mention the safety aspect of driving a manual gearbox. Most of us do not have Senna’s capability of doing the perfect gear shift at the perfect moment or rather even using the cars clutch and change of momentum to get faster through a corner. Some of us are actually dangerous drivers which are much better off keeping their hand on the steering wheel when launching a 400HP+ sportscar through a corner.
Manual for the racecar, daily a automatic. It’s that simple
Bro. I am already following you. Why? Posts like this.
Also. 100% agreement.
I absolutely hate it when people call sequential shifters “automatic” because they just aren’t. At least call them semi-automatic.
I dont care which one is faster i have driven a manual car for 5 minutes in my life and i will never ever want to own an auto, it is just not fun
Pagination