Abarth 124 Spider Review: Why The Best MX-5 Isn’t A Mazda
Pros
Cons
Before taking delivery of this Abarth 124 Spider for a one-week loan, I was fixated on one detail. Not the spectacular black, white and black livery, nor the fact that the weather is still too rubbish to properly enjoy a convertible sports car. No, it was the price.
You see, this small and not particularly luxurious drop-top, which is built on the same production line as the ND Mazda MX-5 upon which it’s based (but finished at Officine Abarth in Turin), will cost you a fiver under £30,000. And if you were thinking that increase in price over the Fiat 124 gets you a load of extra power, it doesn’t.
170bhp is the not-so magic figure, an increase of 36bhp, while torque has increased by 7lb ft to 184lb ft. Not terribly impressive given that the 197bhp Toyota GT86 - itself a car criticised for not having enough poke - can be had for about £6000 less in its most basic trim. It certainly doesn’t feel like a £30,000 car inside. The Alcantara on the dash is a nice touch, but the cabin is awash with cheap and nasty-feeling plastics. And that’s great for keeping the mass down, but not for making you feel like you’re getting your money’s worth.
But here’s the thing: the ladies and gents at Abarth HQ have done quite a bit more than tickle the 1.4-litre turbocharged inline-four and sling in some new interior fabrics. We have Abarth-specific dampers at each corner, complete with lower Bilstein springs. There’s also a limited-slip differential at the back and Brembo brakes give extra stopping power. But the icing on the cake is something Abarth calls a ‘Record Monza’ exhaust system.
Yes, four exhaust tips for 177bhp does seem a touch excessive, but the new pipework makes a tremendous racket. You get a surprisingly loud and angry blare the moment the engine coughs to life after prodding the starter button.
On the move, it’s even more hilarious. I’m not sure I’d call it a nice or particularly tuneful exhaust noise, just an ever-present, shouty rasp. I’ve never, ever heard a car with such a small engine make such a big deal of its internal combustion. It’s like one of those small, yappy dogs that compensates for its diminutive size by making a crap tonne of noise. Could it become tiresome after a while? Potentially, but in a week of driving, I loved it every time I got behind the wheel.
The noise isn’t accompanied by scorching performance, however. The modest 170bhp has just 1060kg to haul around, making for a decent 0-62mph time of 6.8 seconds. But at no point does it feel that quick, despite what the obnoxious exhaust is trying to tell you.
Catch it below 2000rpm before the turbocharger has woken up, and progress is almost non-existent. I actually found myself changing down gears to get up hills from time to time - not something I remember having to do in a performance car recently.
Above 2000rpm, it pulls quite nicely in the mid range, but never dramatically so, finishing off at the top end with a 6500rpm redline. But I don’t think that matters: performance cars are getting so ludicrously quick now, it’s nice to drive something you can actually put your foot down in for extended periods of time. And it’s a plus that you actually need to chop through a few gears to get up to decent speeds, as the short-shifting and surprisingly hefty six-speed manual gearbox is an utter joy to use.
Besides, straight-line performance isn’t really this car’s trump card - handling is where the Abarth’d 124 shines. It’s not some sort of ultra-stiff track weapon - it’s been kept reasonably soft, so it can blast across the crappiest roads without bouncing around and getting out of shape. Chuck it in particularly quickly and you will get roll, but it’s never enough to be an issue - this is simple, well-judged damping at its best, with no need for complex adaptive shenanigans.
The steering is super quick and gives a decent amount of feedback from the road surface, and when you provoke the limited-slip differential-equipped rear end into oversteer territory (easy enough to do on 205 section tyres), it’s stupidly easy to manage even if you’re an oaf like me. This is all possible - of course - with the benefit of infinite headroom, accessed by the disarmingly simple manual roof that makes electric ones seem pointlessly complex.
When your day of amusingly loud hoonery is over, you’re treated to what’s arguably the best bit of Abarth life: looking back at the magnificence of your retro throwback sports car. I’m not a huge fan of the looks of the Fiat 124, but with the angrier Abarth body parts added, not to mention the matte black bonnet/boot and red accents, it’s much more my cup of tea. The livery is - by the way - a nod to the original Abarth 124 Spider, and while there are other exterior options, this is the only right choice.
It - along with the chassis changes and other Abarth touches - makes it just about feel worth the cost. Sure, the same cash could buy you some kind of hot hatch that’s way more practical and has the performance to blow this little roadster into the weeds, but as far as something that offers a pure, rear-driven and lightweight sports car experience, you won’t find much else for the money. Well, apart from a Mazda MX-5, but none are as good to drive as this, nor quite so cool or special-feeling. It’s official: the best MX-5 isn’t a Mazda…it’s this.
Comments
The MX-5 that could of been. But of course, Mazda prefers to stick to their natural aspiration ethos, which is great.
The properly written comment that could‘ve been
God abarth has come a long way from the times they made a car that the bonnet wouldn’t close haha
Shhhhhhhhhh Alex Is Watching!!!!!!!
Apparently it made it go faster
the 124 spyder abarth is the Gay car ot the year
Yeah, for cooling..
When you want an MX-5, but you are not a hairdresser
When you want an MX-5, but you’re not a person who likes a reliable car from a brand that hasn’t produced some of the famously ugliest and worst cars known to man surviving to them only because its state literally held it alive no matter wha-er, gay.
Why would anyone need heavier, more expensive, worse looking both inside and outside (IMO) mx-5? If u need more power than 2.0 litre mx-5 delivers, then buy bbr super 190 turbo package for less than 3k pounds and be happy!
The looks are subjective, but you do make a good point with the BBR package, and it is something I had in mind when testing this. You’d need to spend a little more on top to get the chassis improvements, though - it’s been a while since I’ve driven a 2.0-litre MX-5 but I recall it being quite a bit softer than this.
You could always add the mopar package to the abarth that adds more power
I love the looks, and also how is it worse on the inside?
And the best part is, you have an excuse to say the name while holding your hands like this:
Overused, but still fun XD
REEEEEEEEEEE
AYYYY I GOT AN ITALIAN SPORTS CAR OVAAA HEEEE
I would just have an MX5, the MX-5 is a car which doesn’t look more than it is, The Abarth (and I have this issue with the 500 too) does.
I can’t believe the new Toyota Yaris GRMN can beat this 124 (205 bhp vs 170 bhp). (P.S. Record Monza exhaust?!? This Monza will roast you.)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VPMBR-imqUk
What a good looking driver with amazing hair :|
Hey! You own the kickass M3 from CT older vids right?
Nvm, you are! But what’s with the facebook link though?
TRAITOR
Would still take a Toyota GT86 over this