6 Things I Learned From A Passenger Ride In The New Alpine A110

Pagination
- Page 3
- Previous page
After a prolonged absence from the motoring world, the Alpine brand is back, having been resurrected by Renault - its new owner. Previously the purveyors of curious rear-engined sports cars, the brand is in the process of launching an all-new, mid-engined Porsche Cayman rival, expected to cost around £50,000.
I was fortunate enough to spend some time in the passenger seat of several A110s at Renault’s Aubevoye test track ahead of the car’s media launch this Autumn, and from what I’ve seen so far, it’s looking very, very promising…
These days, the phrase ‘turbocharged inline-four’ usually makes me want to fall asleep, and I was indeed worried I’d be presented with a monotonous drone from the transversely-mounted, 1.8-litre unit. But, Alpine has managed extract a pleasing din from the all-new engine.
It’s quite throaty and angry at mid to high revs, with the aural experience enhanced by a sound tube that pipes noise from the airbox into the cabin through a hole in the bulkhead.
You also get a nicely aggressive ‘thwack’ every time the seven-speed dual-clutch gearbox swaps a cog, which goes some way to make up for the lack of manual option.
2. It's a hero in the corners

The Alpine seems to roll very little, and can change direction with savage speed and efficiency. Grip certainly doesn’t seem to be an issue, and during the drifty segment of the day, it took some provocation for the test driver to get the A110’s rear to step out.
Being a mid-engine car, once pushed beyond the limit, the back does step out relatively quickly. But, as Laurent Hurgon (the driving badass responsible for Renault’s Nurburgring records) explained to us, the ESP system will cut in to stop you spinning even in Race Mode.

So, it’ll make you look like a hero without the risk of something highly embarrassing happening. Oh, and you can turn the ESP off entirely, should you wish.
It’s hard to draw any firm conclusions when sat in the ‘wrong’ seat, but so far, the A110 looks to be an incredibly well-rounded car in the handling department.
3. The interior is great, mostly...

Jumping in the A110, the first thing that hits you is the size of the cabin - it really isn’t big in there. It’s a lovely space though, with the deep, quilted bucket seats and the ‘floating’ console in the middle of the two chairs being highlights in particular.
Some of the switchgear - taken from the Renault parts bin, as you’d expect - isn’t the nicest however, and some of the materials used for the dashboard feel cheap. But since less hefty-feeling materials keep the weight down, we aren’t going to complain much.
4. It doesn't feel hugely fast

The 250bhp offered up by the A110’s 1.8-litre turbocharged engine may not sound much, especially when you bear in mind the Porsche 718 Cayman S puts out 345bhp. But with a kerb weight of 1080kg, the A110 is over 300kg lighter than the Porsche, meaning the power-to-weight ratio isn’t all that far off.
It’s all thanks to an obsession with weight saving. It’s constructed largely from aluminium, and is a particularly compact car overall. The Otto Fuchs wheels measure a relatively modest 18 inches in diameter, and the tyres aren’t even that wide - you’re looking at 205/40s at the front, and 235/40s at the rear. And those seats we’re so fond of? They’re just 13.1kg apiece.
The healthy power-to-weight enables the A110 to do 0-62mph in 4.5 seconds. A decent innings, but it’s worth pointing out it doesn’t feel particularly fast or dramatic at full throttle. It’s the handling you’ll be enjoying here most, not the straight-line performance.
5. It's weirdly comfortable

You won’t find a fancy (and heavy) adaptive suspension system on the A110. Instead, the car (which also has double wishbones front and rear) just uses a very well honed set of dampers, complete with hydraulic bump stops.
With no suspension modes to fiddle with, you’d think the A110 with its stellar body control would be stupidly stiff. But no - over the course of our day at Aubevoye the engineers and test drivers were awfully keen to hammer home the point that this is supposed to be a sports car you can daily, not some uncompromising track car.
This ethos is very clearly translated into the A110’s chassis: it rides incredibly well, even when taken over the rougher parts of the test track. On the typically crap road surfaces of the UK’s B roads, we doubt you’ll be complaining about the ride.
6. It might actually be the Porsche Cayman rival we've been waiting for

Even now it’s lost a pair of cylinders, the Porsche Cayman is still the defacto sports car of choice at this end of the market. And to understand why, you just have to take a look at the car’s rivals.
The Audi TT RS grips like a damn barnacle and has a sensational engine, but it’s a bit of a blunt instrument. The Jaguar F-Type is a bit too big and a bit too heavy to be considered a true rival, while the twitchy, uncompromising Alfa Romeo 4C is a much more niche proposition.
The Alpine A110 on the other hand has the requisite purity in its mid-engined, weight-obsessed design to take on the 718 Cayman, and judging by our passenger rides, it might just have the handling to show the Porsche a clean pair of heels. It certainly sounds better, arguably looks better, and represents a much more interesting choice than the obvious Porsche.
We can’t wait to have a drive…
Comments
If Honda could make their cars sound so good on the inside, they would stop getting so much hate.
They aren’t getting much hate to begin with, besides, the people who hate Hondas so much are hardcore fanboys of something else, so a sound improvement wouldn’t help anyway
Dude, nobody ever said anything about interior Honda sound. But Honda hasn’t built a nice car in a long time. The NSX is a total let down(3 types of grill on the nose??? after 10 years development???and trying to pit it against Mclaren, Ferrari etc). For us as fans, for buyers, for Honda as a company that invested. The Civic type R is quick but you can’t really call it nice. All they have to do is start building nice cars. You can’t have an old ass car fleet, meant for the average 45+ year old person, 1 supercar you halfassed and 1 performance hatchback that looks like a 10 year old designed it after learnin car design from FF1. Where are the legendary friggin Hondas of the 90ies, mate? Where is that weird uncle (S2000) that makes everyone at the table shut up the second he opens his mouth? Nowhere, because all the good cars they made were struck off the budget lists, leaving only the type R with it’s designed and made in Congo body kit.
A shoutout to Alpine for going down the lightweight path. Still, i dont think this will be a good rival to the Cayman. People who buy cars for appearance will go for the cayman because its a Porsche, and petrolheads will go for the cayman because it has manual transmission.
Hear Hear! The fact they chose weight saving over power increase to match a Boxster in 2017 (year of the hp war) tells me they are not going straight for Boxster customers. I would not have compared the 2 directly to be honest. It’s always journalists that have to put us into a mindset where every car MUST be measured up to another one. They’re similar in powertrain layout and compact size but that is about it. The Boxster is a beast perfected over 18 years, precise, supple and equipped for the demanding yuppie. This one is the fresh kid, a little undecided what it wants to be. Regardless, I love the fact they chose low weight compared to peak power.
1.8 litre-turbo - Sounds like an American type of Dacia
2 more years, Alpine will release the A113
“Alpine brand is back, having been resurrected by Renault - its new owner”
Renault owns Alpine since 1973… C’mon guys…
Until I see more of this, the only sports car I’d have with an auto is the Alfa 4C. That’s not to say I’m not interested in this, I just think a manual is the way to go for a low-power, handling-oriented car. A manual box would be lighter, and with a 0-60 of a “slow” 4.5 seconds, there isn’t any need for a quick-shifting auto box.
And I fail to see why they needed the DCT on this car. Adds unnecessary fluff, building complexity and repair bills. The money that went into that POS box could have been spent on a good manual and a slightly more interesting motor. Mind you not power… just… not the typical 6200rpm redline transverse sub 2 litre 4 piston econo option for a 40000 euro car.
You know what I learned?
Living in America has serious disadvantages.
Uh… Just relax, with your cheap JDM inports, and 2.5 litre minimum on older BMWs. You’re also got plenty of handling cars to chose from.
It looks like a brz/frs/ae86 had sex with a Porsche, how can it compete with its own mother the cayman?
The cayman did not birth the A110. The A110 from 1960ies birthed the A110.
Pagination