The Nissan Qashqai Is Stupidly Popular, But I’m Not Sure It Should Be
Pros
Cons
The sheer volume of Qashqais shifted by Nissan over the years is simply staggering. 3.3 million have been built since the first generation was released in 2007, and to put that in perspective, that’s nearly 100 Qashqais for every GT-R flogged in the same period. Yikes.
It had a huge part to play in the worldwide explosion of crossover popularity, and Nissan reckons it now has 20 competitors each trying to imitate the car’s success. We’ve no doubt the Qashqai will continue to be a massive seller, but after a drive in the facelifted second-generation version we’d have to say it’s no longer something to recommend above all else.
Not because a hatchback will be cheaper, faster and more efficient - by now we know that your average crossover buyer is certain they need the ground clearance and driving position of a crosser and can’t be convinced otherwise. No: the problem is that the Qashqai is nowhere near the best car in the class any more.
Before we get to why, it’s important to point out there’s a lot to like. The facelift has given the front end Nissan’s fancy ‘V motion’ design motif thing plus some fancy new leather bits in the cabin, sprucing proceedings up nicely. Oh, and the naff, dated steering wheel has been ditched for something a little more modern and button-festooned. It’s just as roomy on the inside as it ever was, and boot space is decent.
The 1.6-litre, 129bhp diesel - yours from £26,805 - is reasonably refined and sounds weirdly un-diesel like, and Nissan has even had a play with the car’s handling. The dampers have had a subtle retune, as has the electric power steering.
We’re not going to pretend it’s a Porsche Macan all of a sudden, but the steering is genuinely quite nice and natural-feeling. The car still rolls quite easily of course, but not excessively so. Mr and Mrs Qashqai owner aren’t likely to be hankering after a country road blat particularly often, remember.
The trouble is, the changes aren’t enough to get the Qashqai back to the front of the pack. It’s starting to look old inside, particularly when you start to play with the infotainment system and its ancient-looking graphics and lack of proper smartphone syncing. It’s perfectly serviceable and the touch screen is reasonable, but that’s not good enough given the extreme levels of competition in this sector now.
There is a Bose sound system option available at least, which Nissan seems very excited about in its press material. But it’s disappointingly flat-sounding - the Dynaudio systems VW Group has started fitting in many of its cars are far better.
Right now, if I attempt to put myself in the shoes of a crossover buyer (a particularly hard thing to do, I admit), I can’t think of a good reason why I’d have one over the Seat Ateca. The Spanish combatant in this bitterly contested crossover war is better to drive, arguably better to look at, much nicer inside and has a considerably better infotainment system. Oh, and if you want an automatic, you can have a snappy dual-clutch arrangement. In the Nissan the only auto option is a CVT. Boo.
Slipping so far off the mark in a talent-laden part of the market really isn’t ideal. If we were to think of the crossover sector as The Avengers, the Qashqai would be Hawkeye. Sure, he’s pretty good at what he does, but you know you’d rather have Iron Man fighting your corner. Or maybe Thor.
The Qashqai’s aforementioned attributes combined with attractive pricing mean it’s sure to continue selling in big numbers, but we’d be surprised if it continues to spam the world like an Internet meme to the same degree it has done in years gone by.
Comments
Qashqai - sounds like chinese, and thats why people buy it.
For me, it’s sounds like arabic or turkish
To be honest, a Chinese brand name would deter me - not so much for cars but very much for electrical goods. I’m generalising a lot here, but safety standards and quality are often much poorer. For example, you can buy an “electrode boiler” that allows you to heat up a cup of water. Catch is that it basically involves putting the device into the water and having 230 volts run through the water. Touch the thing while it’s running? You’re dead. Dip your finger in the water? You’re dead. Put a metal spoon in? You’re dead.Only in China.
to me, it sounds like an exotic fruit
I never understood how the Nissan Qashqai (or SUVs in general on that matter) could become so popular. Most of them have weak engines, are FWD and have only ~30mm more ground clearance than their normal counterparts. That’s all stuff I could live with if they weren’t all abominations that look like a splash of Mercury put into a wind tunnel and then had black and grey plastics glued on it.
I think I know. They are designed for families, i.e you can get like 2 buggies in the back, its full of cubbie holes which are perfect for family storage. The extra height makes it that bit more practical
Most people… don’t care?
They want something with lots of space (SUVs have as much of it as MPVs - which are even uglier).
They want something that would forgive them for not noticing a pothole (while they are staring at their phone)
Or that would enable them to park their car on a kerb (because the car park is too far from the shops)
Or that would allow them to see the car edges better (because they are useless at parking and maneuvering the car)
Also it gives a (false) sense of safety and superiority
Hope this explains
its because crossovers are stupid vehicles bought mainly be stupid people. Why would you get a fake off-roader when an estate version of a hatchback can do everything better?
“..your average crossover buyer is certain they need the ground clearance and driving position of a crosser and can’t be convinced otherwise. “
This bit is so true! Why? Why on earth would you sacrifice space, convenience, safety, price and performance to sit a few mm higher on the road? All the crossover owners I know are of the same opinion. That they NEED that extra height. It’s absolutely ridiculous! These things are small hatchbacks on stilts. Honestly there is not much more space in a Sportage or a GashQai than in my wifes Corsa. If you have an active lifestyle buy an estate with roof bars like a normal person. It’ll be cheaper, bigger and just plain better in every other conceivable way.
My mom’s CX-5 has about the same space inside as my Golf 5. Ridiculous.
Estates people, estates!!!
Precisely. Still has the storage space, better-looking in my opinion, and lower center of gravity. Only problem is that it doesn’t have the stupidly high riding position that so many people want.
The Qashqai has been around for a decade and I still don’t quite have an answer to why it’s so popular.
I mean sure they are practical, but estates are just as practical, if not more…
I guess it just depends on the size of the family and their required needs
Is it relatively cheap?
Is it reliable/farily well built?
Do people know what it is?
Has it a good reputation?
There’s your answer - people don’t care about specs or the finer detail. They want a ‘car’.
if they cared about actual value, they would be in a Golf
They don’t want just any car. They want to be in one of those cheesy SUV lifestyle ads.
I have to say that when i was in one of the release events for the new kia sportage in 2016, they gave us the kia the qashqai and others to play with and i would have the Kia any day
£27k for a 1.6 diesel stilted-hatchback? A stock BMW 3 series costs around the same…
Who here actually drove one? I did! And I have to say that they are not bad at all. Chassis is pretty agile and you don’t feel that the higher centre of gravity is a handicap. I don’t really like the style, but it’s a matter of each one’s taste. But what I love about it is that you can go over speed bumps at 40-50 km/h without giving a s…. instead of slowing down to 20 km/h. Here in France, speed bumps are literally everywhere and ruin your everyday driving pleasure.
Yeah xc60 and sportage. I could live with the xc60 but it’s a cut above. Damn the sportage to hell!
ok