A90 Toyota GR Supra Review: No Revelation, But Don't Let That Put You Off

Pros
Cons
Pagination
- Page 1
- Next page
Years after being previewed by a concept car and following a relentless teaser campaign, we finally saw the final production rebirth of a legend. It revived a name we hadn’t seen on a new car for the best part of two decades, and expectations were high. And for many, those lofty expectations weren’t quite met.
I’m not talking about the A90 Toyota GR Supra. Nope, I’m referring to the hybrid Honda NSX, a car with which Toyota’s new sports car can draw many parallels. It’s another Japanese performance machine resurrecting a badge that has an almost terrifying level of adoration attached to it, and which has arrived after a similarly lengthy gestation period. On paper, nothing about it stands out as extraordinary, so is this going to be another NSX moment?
After finally driving it, we’d have to say no, but not because it does anything that tears up the rule book.

What we should note from the off is that it does, despite sharing a platform and engine, drive quite differently to the BMW Z4. Which is a good thing. While the BMW feels ponderous and less-than willing to change direction quickly, the much more rigid Supra hides its weight brilliantly. It tips the scales at a relatively porky 1570kg, but you’d swear it’s a couple of hundred kilos less.
In fact, it turns in rather beautifully, a surprisingly active rear end - so long as you’ve switched to ESP Sport - making the car feel all pointy. It’s actually quite feisty, the meaty mid-range of that B58 inline-six often overpowering the 275mm-wide Michelin Pilot Supersports out back.

Damping is, on the whole, very good, letting the Supra shrug off ill-placed yumps on corner entry, and you don’t feel like you’re about to be spat off into a barrier. In Sport mode the low-speed ride isn’t the smoothest, but that’s about our only complaint.
The steering is very 2019, by which we mean it’s all fast and darty off-centre, but a little light and not exactly feelsome. We can live with it. The 335bhp engine, though? Perhaps not.

The whole inspiration behind the Supra project was BMW’s inline-six. The car’s chief engineer Tetsuya Tada took the idea of a joint relationship with Munich as a ‘sign’ that the new Supra should happen, BMW being the only mainstream company making high-performance straight-sixes.
The trouble is, the B58 is weirdly lacking in character. It has neither the boosty attitude of its 1M-powering N54 ancestor, nor the outright aggression of the S55 found in the M stuff. You never really want to rev it out, as at anything over 5000rpm it feels strained and almost breathless. Most of the time you’ll end up keeping it in the mid-range.

Yes, it’s a turbocharged inline-six, nicely matching the engine configuration of the fabled, nay, worshipped MkIV Supra, but it’s far from a remarkable engine. It’s a shame Toyota didn’t at least engineer some pops and bangs on the upshifts to add some drama.
On the subject of the gearbox, it’s a similar story to the engine. The quiet and efficient eight-speed ZF torque converter is perfectly adequate for the job, but nothing memorable. It’s a little reluctant on down-shifts too. A manual was never on the cards, but a snappier DCT - for both the Z4 and the Supra - would have been more befitting.

Despite all this, the Supra is a perfectly worthy, nicely sorted sports car. It’s just that it isn’t mind-blowing, even if you take the unreasonable expectations that come with the name out of the equation.
For many, that’ll be just fine, so long as they’re happy with the cabin being rather titchy. It’s a distinctive-looking coupe that’s just a little bit spicy to drive while still being approachable. When making such a car right now is so unfashionable, you can’t help but be pleased it’s here.

You could instead look at it as a solid starting point. Tada-san told us that a GRMN version has to happen, which for anyone not quite taken by the base GR Supra should be good news. Let’s just hope they stuff the S55 into it…















Comments
Really good shots in this, if I ever get one, i’d get it in that yellow.
That’s how Car Throttle Articles should be, good writing and awsome Pictures.
On another note, anyone else share my thought that the A80 will be higher in Price then the A90 like 1 or 2 months after sales start?
Yellow cars other than taxis have gotten rare… so nice to see they offer that on the Supra
Arent the boxter, m2 competition,alpine, Mustang, camaro all vastly superior cars?
Or a hot hatch?
Or buy a cheaper sports car and mod it(GT86, MIATA).
I dont see fhe point of rhis car (based on current reviews)
Maisto or Bburago should make a 1/18 model of this. I will buy.
It looks soooo nice, yellow fits the car perfectly
It’s a shame Toyota didn’t at least engineer some pops and bangs on the upshifts to add some drama.
-CT
Then there’s the sound, On or off throttle, but especially off, you’re treated to a symphony of pops and bangs that rivals that of the V6 and V8 Jaguar F-Type in terms of volume and quality. It’s truly one of the better-sounding sports cars you can buy right now.
-Jalopnik
i bamboozled
as much as I think this car is mildly interesting I do believe it fails to live up to the supra’s legendary status. It’s certainly missing that certain magic the mk4 had
I don’t care what the haters say
The Supra is a great sports car for what it is and it will live up to its name
Hopefully, it comes with a manual transmission the Supra deserves
There is something really weird about your B58 review CT…
You said in nov 2016 about the N55 M2 : “Its 3.0-litre engine doesn’t make the most inspiring noise, but it’s eager and surprisingly revvy.” Now most BMW entusiast know that the B58 is noticeably more rev happy than its predecessor the N55 (the debate we can have is about the fact the N55 may sound better than all the other 6 cyl produced by BMW from the N54 included..but that’s not the question there). Thus it’s really surprising that you are saying “You never really want to rev it out, as at anything over 5000rpm it feels strained and almost breathless”. If this really is the case then you probably always shifted before 4000rpm in your test of the N55 powered M2 ?
However, you got a point about the ZF8 being a real disappointment in place of the DCT (BMW trying to bambouzel us saying it’s about reliability, ect…when it’s all about cost saving..).
Pagination