8 Pickup Trucks For On-Road Use Only

For decades, manufacturers avoided performance pickup trucks like Volkswagen avoids calls from the Environmental Protection Agency. But there have been a few trucks built for paved corners instead of rocky trails
8 Pickup Trucks For On-Road Use Only

Pickup trucks have been around in one form or another for almost 100 years, and they were never, ever meant to be high-performance vehicles. I suppose that’s because the qualities that make a good pickup - large cargo capacities, heavy-duty components and prolific ground clearance - are pretty much the exact opposite of what makes a good performance car. And that’s why even now, the idea of a high-performance on-road pickup truck is still a very polarising topic amongst both car and pickup enthusiasts.

Personally I love them, but I need to make something clear. When I say performance on-road pickup trucks, I don’t just mean a massive chunk of truck with an equally massive engine. I’m also talking machines with enough handling ability to push through a canyon byway without making everyone seasick. Nor am I considering Australian utes as part of the pickup world. No doubt they’re cool, but utes are far more car than pickup.

Trucks are still vastly the domain of those who think hauling ass requires a horse trailer. But in a world of towering suspension lifts and weekend mud bog meets, these trucks only go off-road when the driver misses an apex.

1. 1978-1979 Dodge Lil Red Express Truck

8 Pickup Trucks For On-Road Use Only

Some might say the emissions-choked 1970s gave birth to this whole performance truck genre. That’s because pickups weren’t subject to all the same emission regulations as cars, so Dodge took their lightest 2WD pickup, dressed it up, installed fat on-road tyres and gave it a 5.9-litre V8 that made 225bhp. Yes, everything was slow back then, but trucks were supposed to be really slow. So when the Lil’ Red Express Truck did 0-60 mph in 7.5 seconds, it wasn’t just impressive for a pickup, it was the fastest American production vehicle in 1978.

2. 1990-1993 Chevrolet 454SS

8 Pickup Trucks For On-Road Use Only

Using the old muscle car formula of stuffing the biggest engine into the lightest body, Chevrolet squeezed a 7.4-litre (454 cubic-inch) V8 into a single cab, short box, 2WD half-ton pickup. Suspension, steering and brakes were also tweaked, and to make sure people knew it wasn’t just another Chevy pickup, it was given a monochromatic black paint job. The massive engine only made 230bhp (increased to 255bhp in the later years) but it was a torque monster that could destroy tyres, or when throttled just right, shove the 454SS to 60mph in about 7 seconds.

3. 1991 GMC Syclone

8 Pickup Trucks For On-Road Use Only

For just one year, General Motors went a bit mad and turned its compact GMC Sonoma pickup truck into a supercar killer. Using a turbocharged 4.3-litre V6, the Syclone sent 280bhp to all four wheels in an automotive-type full time all-wheel drive system. With suspension modifications, a low center of gravity and a curb weight about the same as a Toyota Supra, it was also fairly spry in the corners. It was automatic only but buyers didn’t care, because it could rip to 60mph in around 5 seconds and turn a high 13-second quarter-mile, which in 1991 was quick enough to beat just about everything.

4. 1993-1995 / 1999-2004 Ford SVT F-150 Lightning

8 Pickup Trucks For On-Road Use Only

When Ford’s Special Vehicle Team dropped a 240bhp 5.8-litre V8 into the lightest 2WD F-150 in 1993 (pictured at the top of the page), it was pretty clear they were going after Chevy’s 454SS. Straight-line performance was equal, but engineers spent more time developing the Lightning’s suspension to actually make it handle pretty well. Then they took it to a whole new level in 1999 with the supercharged Lightning that could dance in the corners, then hit 140mph on the straightaways. Ford ultimately got 380bhp from the second-generation’s boosted 5.4-litre engine, which was enough to unseat the Syclone as the quickest production pickup until the Viper-powered Ram entered the scene.

5. 1998-2003 Dodge Dakota R/T

8 Pickup Trucks For On-Road Use Only

Before the insanity that would become the Ram SRT-10, Dodge saw fit to equip its midsize Dakota pickup with a 250bhp 5.9-litre V8 and call it R/T. As with other performance trucks of the period, the Dakota R/T received a lowered sport suspension with quicker steering and sticky on-road rubber. Yet despite its midsize classification, the Dakota’s performance was similar to that of the full-size pickups. That shouldn’t suggest it was a disappointment; the R/T could hit 60mph in about 7 seconds and handle corners nearly as well as the second-generation Lightning.

6. 2003-2006 Chevrolet Silverado SS

8 Pickup Trucks For On-Road Use Only

Chevy’s 454SS follow-up could hit 60mph in a shade over 6 seconds - certainly fast for a truck but not as fast as the Lightning or the SRT Ram. Nor was it as aggressive in the corners as its competition, but it did offer a road-based full time all-wheel drive system with a lowered suspension that compromised well between grip, poise and comfort. Its 345bhp 6.0-litre V8 was the same mill used in other Chevy trucks so it was reliable, and for those who had a tyre-smoking habit, a two-wheel drive version was offered in 2006.

7. 2004-2006 Dodge Ram SRT-10

8 Pickup Trucks For On-Road Use Only

Not only did Dodge somehow manage to defy the laws of physics with this 2.5-tonne monster, they also finally gave enthusiasts a performance pickup with a manual gearbox. That’s because the gearbox - as well as the 8.3-litre, 500bhp V10 - came directly from the Dodge Viper. That explains why the Ram SRT-10 clocked 60mph in under 5 seconds and reached 153mph, despite having the aerodynamic prowess of a speed brake. And though its center of gravity was actually higher than the roof of a Ford GT, it still managed to corner nearly as hard as an E39 BMW M5. Sure, fuel mileage was laughable and maintenance usually required a second mortgage, but there’s never been a more bonkers performance truck.

8. 2005-2013 Toyota Tacoma X-Runner

8 Pickup Trucks For On-Road Use Only

I love throwing the X-Runner into the performance truck mix, if for no other reason than to watch the SRT and Lightning guys lose their minds over a Japanese pickup challenging their turf. I’m certainly a fan of muscle, and while the other trucks handle really well compared to trucks, the X-Runner handles well compared to cars. Having a good six-speed manual gearbox adds to the pleasure, and when the road begins to wind through the countryside, it’s easy to forget there’s a big stinking cargo bed behind you. Its 236bhp delivers only average thrust by modern standards, but the whole package is every bit as enjoyable to drive as it is practical to use.

Sponsored Posts

Comments

Dat muscle guy (Sam Stone)(Camaro Squad)(Die augen leader)(E

Wait doesn’t the El Camino SS 454 qualify in this list? as far as I remember it was also a pickup

01/10/2016 - 06:47 |
2 | 2

Not really. It’s more of a car with a bed. Basically an American Ute.

01/10/2016 - 07:08 |
12 | 0

As far as I’m concerned, the El Camino and its Ford counterpart, the Ranchero, are dubbed as ‘coupé utility,’ not ‘pickup.’

01/10/2016 - 07:50 |
2 | 0
Americancarguy 2

Interesting fact: in the late ‘90s, Dodge made a non-performance orientated V10 heavy duty truck.

01/10/2016 - 07:06 |
4 | 4

Yeah, mostly duallys and they were pretty good for what they were. Don’t see too many of them because most buyers didn’t opt for the 10 cylinder engines and the ones that were bought suffered from major rust issues

01/10/2016 - 13:24 |
2 | 0

And that’s where the original Viper’s engine came from.

01/10/2016 - 17:20 |
0 | 0
V-TEC

Omg that 454 power output.
7.5l corvette engine after the 70s cat conversation made more.
And also made 500hp before!

01/10/2016 - 07:52 |
0 | 0
suchdoge

In reply to by V-TEC

I think GM uses Net power figures on the 454, in gross terms and straight piped it would be 500hp

01/10/2016 - 09:33 |
2 | 0
Anonymous

What about this for those New Zealanders and ozzies out there!

01/10/2016 - 09:14 |
8 | 2
vettie_ 26

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

Apparently these are not pick up’s,wich i think is silly

01/10/2016 - 09:38 |
12 | 0
Anonymous

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

It makes me impossibly angry that in America we haven’t had a ute since the 80s. I would even consider buying GM if they were selling a ute state side..

01/10/2016 - 17:58 |
8 | 0
Anonymous

Really? Where’s the SVT Raptor?

01/10/2016 - 10:26 |
0 | 0
🎺🎺thank mr skeltal

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

“8 pickups for on-road use only

01/10/2016 - 12:26 |
2 | 0
Anonymous

Utes aren’t here cause they work out of the street a little bit, but these on the list are just pointless!!

01/10/2016 - 10:42 |
0 | 4
Anonymous

X-Runner <3

01/10/2016 - 12:19 |
2 | 0
Anonymous

I’m a little upset they didn’t mention the 09-12 v8 chevrolet colorado, I have an 09 with the sport suspension and v8 factory options. It is definitely an on road only truck.

01/10/2016 - 13:02 |
10 | 0
Anonymous

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

Thought the same thing regarding the Colorado Xtreme and SS packages. The Colorado Xtreme is ridiculously comparable to the Tacoma X-runner

01/10/2016 - 13:32 |
0 | 0
Anonymous

Great article until you got to the Tacoma, then you found yourself contradicting your earlier statement about the srt-10 cornering almost on part with an M5. The Tacoma X-runner was very similar and even with the GM S10/Sonoma Xtreme packages, as well as the later, more comparable GM Colorado/Canyon Xtreme and SS packages. It’s almost a shame to mention one without the others.

01/10/2016 - 13:30 |
2 | 0
Anonymous

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

The X-Runner outcorners the SRT… Unfortunately, it lacks power, making the SRT the all-around winner.

01/11/2016 - 03:50 |
0 | 0
Christopher Smith

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

I see your point, and it’s a good one. Let me see if I can clarify a bit; I don’t equate lateral g solely with cornering ability. I meant the SRT holds on nearly as well as an E39 M5 (which I think is quite a shocking realization, hence why I went with it), but it’s still a crazy big truck that feels a bit unnerving cornering that hard, despite having similar skidpad numbers to the Bimmer. And I think we’d all agree that, given a choice between the two, the E39 is going to be the machine we’d enjoy thrashing through corners on a regular basis. I think The Xtreme trucks, though smaller / lighter are still in that unsettling category, gripping good but still with that “ok what terrible thing is about to happen” feeling. The X-Runner bites just as hard, that’s true and perhaps I should’ve pointed that out more. But I’m most impressed with the confidence the X-Runner gives drivers in harder cornering. I’m way more comfortable pushing it that hard as opposed to the others, especially the Ram. That’s why I do the sports car comparison; it’s the only “sports truck” I’ve ever driven that didn’t feel like a truck.

01/11/2016 - 05:58 |
2 | 0
Anonymous
01/10/2016 - 13:43 |
14 | 0