Autonomous Safety Systems Will Cause Short Term Gain But Long Term Pain

New research from Autoglass indicates that autonomous safety tech could lower insurance premiums in the short term, but we're not convinced these benefits will last...
Autonomous Safety Systems Will Cause Short Term Gain But Long Term Pain

According to a new study from Autoglass, a whopping 90 per cent of insurers have begun focusing on the benefits of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS). Such systems, which use a variety of sensors and cameras to detect and analyse the area around the vehicle, include technologies such as lane departure warning, blind spot information, and semi-autonomous driving systems.

There’s one form of ADAS that has really caught the eye of the insurance industry, though, and that’s Automatic Emergency Braking (AEB). This technology is now available on a variety of cars including the Volkswagen Up, BMW X5 and Volvo XC90. Most of these systems work by using radar to judge the distance to the car in front, and automatically brake if they believe you’re about to hit the car in front. It’s highly effective; a recent Euro NCAP report demonstrated that AEB can lead to an impressive 38 per cent reduction in real-world rear-end crashes.

Remote video URL

The Association of British Insurers reported late last year that cars equipped with AEB would be likely to fall into lower insurance brackets, and now, thanks to the vehicle safety technology experts Thatcham, AEB has been proved right. Thatcham found that insurance premiums for cars with ADAS are around 10 per cent lower than equivalent cars without.

70 per cent of the insurers that took part in Autoglass’ research expressed that their main priority is to use these systems (which include dash cams) to decrease fraud, while 43 per cent said they were useful for settling claims. So, in the short term, our insurance policies should decrease if we purchase cars with ADAS, as they help insurance companies pay out less. Sounds like a win-win situation, right?

Autonomous Safety Systems Will Cause Short Term Gain But Long Term Pain

Well, not necessarily. As these safety systems become increasingly widespread - a leading industry body has already forecast that 50 per cent of all new vehicles will carry ADAS by 2022 - there is a good chance that instead of cars equipped with ADAS being cheaper to insure, they’ll balance out to become the norm, and cars without ADAS will simply attract much higher premiums instead. If you want to insure your E46 M3 in 2030, you may well have to pay a pretty penny via a specialist performance car insurer. Not ideal.

For most of us, driving is a form of personal freedom - a human right - so it’s no wonder that we’re a little apprehensive about the dawn of autonomous tech-based safety systems. If an automated vehicle is statistically safer, the manually controlled car is always going to be at risk of being forced out. Ultimately, it will be up to the manufacturers to find a happy medium between automation and manual interfaces to keep people safe, insurance affordable, and petrolheads happy.

Sponsored Posts

Comments

Agustín J. Ruatta

Sooner or later we will be confined to race tracks :(

03/16/2016 - 11:08 |
19 | 0

F*ck me then. There’s only one racetrack in my country and it’s 500kms away

03/16/2016 - 12:43 |
9 | 0
495QED

TVR will never install those into their cars

03/16/2016 - 11:16 |
1 | 0
The Retro Lab

No (British) insurance company will ever threaten their profit margins by lowering their premiums - like you said they’re only lowering them now because it means they can pay out less often.

03/16/2016 - 11:25 |
0 | 0
🇮🇩Mk7Golfer 🇦🇺

insert “FCK AUTOPILOT, I WANT TO DRIVE” meme here*

03/16/2016 - 11:35 |
5 | 0
Jack Garanzini

does it only work on balloon cars tho?lol

03/16/2016 - 11:40 |
0 | 0
Marcis Augusts Dzerve

Also, think how much could go wrong with those systems over time. Imagine your AEB system stomping on the brakes while you’re driving on a crowded motorway. Or, even just how much it could cost to repair it.

03/16/2016 - 11:41 |
8 | 0
Anonymous

Wouldn’t it be just easier to teach people how to drive?

03/16/2016 - 11:57 |
63 | 0
kgga

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

No, gotta take a selfie at the gren light I stopped at.

03/16/2016 - 12:27 |
18 | 0
nandee

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

Yes, but then police should actually harass those who are using their phone while driving, instead of hiding behind cameras, and that takes up too much work…

03/16/2016 - 18:28 |
4 | 0
H5SKB4RU (Returned to CT)

the video has more different camera angles than a action movie of the early 2000’s when there’s a massive highway crash scene

03/16/2016 - 12:07 |
2 | 0
Anonymous

Either this Volvo was so scared that it peed on itself, or something is fishy here..

03/16/2016 - 12:09 |
0 | 0
Anonymous

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

03/16/2016 - 12:12 |
0 | 0
Anonymous

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

If it was a hot day (looks like it), and the A/C was on in the car it could cause the moisture on the ground. I’m assuming they tested the system a few times that day, and probably left the car parked where it stopped for a few minutes before moving it back to do the test again. In that time, condensation on the a/c compression would’ve dripped to the ground

03/16/2016 - 17:08 |
0 | 0
Ian Gale

I’m normally not one of those people who go out and point out mistakes, but median, not medium. That bothered me way more than it should have. I’m so sorry.

03/16/2016 - 12:22 |
0 | 0

No, happy medium is a common phrase, and therefore correct. This isn’t high school math, there’s not much need to ever use median in that way.

03/16/2016 - 15:09 |
0 | 0