What F1 Drivers Really Think Of The New Halo Concept 'Thong'

Kimi Raikkonen and Sebastian Vettel were the first to try out the unusual-looking ‘halo’ cockpit protector device and drivers reacted very strongly to its debut
What F1 Drivers Really Think Of The New Halo Concept 'Thong'

So you may well have seen the F1 cockpit protection device that Kimi Raikkonen debuted on the penultimate day of pre-season testing. Yeah, it looks like a thong or a flip-flop, but it is the ‘preferred’ option of the FIA when it comes to improving the safety of the sport.

F1’s governing body said it ‘intends to introduce cockpit protection for 2017’ and the first prototype was trialled by Raikkonen and Ferrari team-mate Sebastian Vettel on the final two days of F1 testing in Spain.

As well as there being mixed reactions from fans, the same can also be said for the drivers. Some strong opinions have been voiced to media at the test track about the ‘halo’ prototype, with Lewis Hamilton and Nico Hulkenberg disapproving of it and others, like Nico Rosberg and Sebastian Vettel, being for the device’s introduction.

Image source: Ferrari
Image source: Ferrari

Hamilton said:

“Please no! This is the worst looking mod in Formula 1 history. I appreciate the quest for safety but this is Formula 1, and the way it is now is perfectly fine. If it does come in then l hope that we will be given the option of not using it because l will not be using it on my car.”

Hulkenberg also isn’t a fan:

“Don’t do it. It sends the wrong message. F1 is very safe at the moment. It looks horrible, I don’t like it and it’s just one of these little personal things that I wouldn’t like to see it.

“You can’t sterilise the sport. There needs to be an element of danger - I think in a way that’s sexy and attractive and it’s also what Formula 1 needs. Safety standards in F1 are pretty high and very good, I’d be happy to accept those risks and keep running as we are.”

Vettel believes it is crucial something like the ‘halo’ is implemented:

“Well I think first of all to go around is OK. You can see what you need to see. I think we can improve the system in terms of aesthetics and also in terms of how much visibly is in your way. Tested as well in the simulator and I think we will see probably evolutions of it very soon.

“In principle, I agree it doesn’t look very nice. It’s not the picture you’re used to from Formula 1 for a long time, but equally it helps increasing the safety and helps saving lives. There would be at least two drivers in the last four years that I remember that would still be around – Henry Surtees and Justin Wilson – if we had this type of system. I think it can be as ugly as possible. I think nothing justifies not having these guys around anymore.”

Ricciardo reacted to Hulkenberg’s comments:

“I heard Hulkenberg say some things I don’t agree with, because there’s no need to be a hero about the situation. It doesn’t change the sport, or the speed of the car – it’s just if there are any flying objects, it’s an extra bit of protection for us.

“I don’t know why he’s puffing his chest out for something like that, it doesn’t make sense. The cars from 2008 to 2009 had a big change, the cars were ugly. The halo isn’t as dramatic as that.”

Felipe Massa, who suffered head injuries when his helmet was struck by debris in 2009, added:

“Safety is the most important thing and I totally agree with the halo or the closed cockpits or whatever - I agree with this change. But it doesn’t look very nice. We’ll see how it’s going to be. If it’s good for the safety, it’s fine.”

Rosberg shared his thoughts on social media:

It’s definitely nice to see drivers sharing their honest thoughts. What do you think about it? Who do you agree with? Let us know in the comments.

Sponsored Posts

Comments

Marcel Pirs

Well, guess what, it’s called extreme sports. Like it or not, there are always lives at risk. If you don’t agree with that, go play chess or golf. Strongly dissagree with this innovation.

03/06/2016 - 19:28 |
1 | 0
Anonymous

Why don’t they just use a plexi visor with an open top

03/06/2016 - 19:36 |
0 | 0
Anonymous

Why not use a fighter plane like windshield in front of the driver, while keeping the space directly above his head free.

That way the car provides protection from flying objects, and still allows for easy escapes when the car is overturned. I think it’d be a good compromise

03/06/2016 - 19:39 |
5 | 0
Graeme Campbell

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

Something like this…

03/06/2016 - 21:57 |
12 | 0
Antonio (Boost Nation)

i miss the good ol’ days of when danger was part of the sport, now its just the same person winning every time and the same thing every lap. Why can’t we just overthrow the FIA and make it a real sport again.

03/06/2016 - 19:52 |
0 | 0
aero_mati

This is just silly, I mean sure it works. But why introduce it? F1 is extremely safe now a days, of course you can’t eliminate or mitigate all risks. If this is for Bianchi’s accident, it wasn’t the cars fault, it was the race control and safety team fault.

I understand FIAs concern, but IMO there are better and less intrusive ways to protect the driver from flying objects.

03/06/2016 - 19:57 |
0 | 0
wild_toilet 🇧🇷 (Miata Addict)

They should just make like a whole roof thing instead of putting a freaking sandal on a car.

03/06/2016 - 20:10 |
0 | 0
Yoorr

Am I the only one who agrees with Vettel? It’s not really nice as it looks now, but I’m sure they are going to improve it through time. You can call F1 an ‘extreme’ sport, but it’s 2016 now, and I don’t think people should die in sports.

03/06/2016 - 20:25 |
4 | 0
Anonymous

I don’t either like or dislike it. But having a damned iron thing in your face reduces the vision angle so much that you will need that to save you.

03/06/2016 - 20:33 |
0 | 0
megi guy

sure block more visability

03/06/2016 - 20:50 |
0 | 0
Callum Luke Norris

that could not stop a sodding rice pudding!!!!
its crap this is like nuetering a prize breeding dog no need

03/06/2016 - 20:59 |
0 | 0