What F1 Drivers Really Think Of The New Halo Concept 'Thong'

Kimi Raikkonen and Sebastian Vettel were the first to try out the unusual-looking ‘halo’ cockpit protector device and drivers reacted very strongly to its debut
What F1 Drivers Really Think Of The New Halo Concept 'Thong'

So you may well have seen the F1 cockpit protection device that Kimi Raikkonen debuted on the penultimate day of pre-season testing. Yeah, it looks like a thong or a flip-flop, but it is the ‘preferred’ option of the FIA when it comes to improving the safety of the sport.

F1’s governing body said it ‘intends to introduce cockpit protection for 2017’ and the first prototype was trialled by Raikkonen and Ferrari team-mate Sebastian Vettel on the final two days of F1 testing in Spain.

As well as there being mixed reactions from fans, the same can also be said for the drivers. Some strong opinions have been voiced to media at the test track about the ‘halo’ prototype, with Lewis Hamilton and Nico Hulkenberg disapproving of it and others, like Nico Rosberg and Sebastian Vettel, being for the device’s introduction.

Image source: Ferrari
Image source: Ferrari

Hamilton said:

“Please no! This is the worst looking mod in Formula 1 history. I appreciate the quest for safety but this is Formula 1, and the way it is now is perfectly fine. If it does come in then l hope that we will be given the option of not using it because l will not be using it on my car.”

Hulkenberg also isn’t a fan:

“Don’t do it. It sends the wrong message. F1 is very safe at the moment. It looks horrible, I don’t like it and it’s just one of these little personal things that I wouldn’t like to see it.

“You can’t sterilise the sport. There needs to be an element of danger - I think in a way that’s sexy and attractive and it’s also what Formula 1 needs. Safety standards in F1 are pretty high and very good, I’d be happy to accept those risks and keep running as we are.”

Vettel believes it is crucial something like the ‘halo’ is implemented:

“Well I think first of all to go around is OK. You can see what you need to see. I think we can improve the system in terms of aesthetics and also in terms of how much visibly is in your way. Tested as well in the simulator and I think we will see probably evolutions of it very soon.

“In principle, I agree it doesn’t look very nice. It’s not the picture you’re used to from Formula 1 for a long time, but equally it helps increasing the safety and helps saving lives. There would be at least two drivers in the last four years that I remember that would still be around – Henry Surtees and Justin Wilson – if we had this type of system. I think it can be as ugly as possible. I think nothing justifies not having these guys around anymore.”

Ricciardo reacted to Hulkenberg’s comments:

“I heard Hulkenberg say some things I don’t agree with, because there’s no need to be a hero about the situation. It doesn’t change the sport, or the speed of the car – it’s just if there are any flying objects, it’s an extra bit of protection for us.

“I don’t know why he’s puffing his chest out for something like that, it doesn’t make sense. The cars from 2008 to 2009 had a big change, the cars were ugly. The halo isn’t as dramatic as that.”

Felipe Massa, who suffered head injuries when his helmet was struck by debris in 2009, added:

“Safety is the most important thing and I totally agree with the halo or the closed cockpits or whatever - I agree with this change. But it doesn’t look very nice. We’ll see how it’s going to be. If it’s good for the safety, it’s fine.”

Rosberg shared his thoughts on social media:

It’s definitely nice to see drivers sharing their honest thoughts. What do you think about it? Who do you agree with? Let us know in the comments.

Sponsored Posts

Comments

Ranbir Singh

As a viewer, I’m on the side of “The risks are a part of the sport”. I can certainly see that the drivers would want to be as safe as possible though, just as I do in a road car. Either way I agree with the people who say they should work on integrating the design into the car. This looks like it was a second thought. This is the 2016 car though, so in this design it was. I am sure it will look better in 2017, and I have no doubt it could be made to look good if they spend time on it.

03/06/2016 - 21:14 |
2 | 0
RomanianRacer

Why not something like this lol…

03/06/2016 - 22:03 |
1 | 0
Dome

well… ehm..

03/06/2016 - 22:04 |
2 | 0
JIM_JDM

Hmm, strange, I thought vettel would’ve said “obviously” after every goddamn sentence, as he does in every single interview. Guess this is some spokesman from vettel…

03/06/2016 - 22:28 |
0 | 0
DL🏁

On this occasion I am 100% with Hamilton’s opinion

03/06/2016 - 22:31 |
0 | 0
James Almond

If its meant to stop things hitting their face, its not going to be very useful, theirs the one bar right in-front of there face which is what, 1/2 cm wide? What if it comes slightly from the side?
Keep the top bar and add curved glass.

03/06/2016 - 22:38 |
0 | 0
BIG BORB

F1 (flip flop 1)

03/06/2016 - 23:51 |
1 | 0
495QED

Will a strong bar on top and bulletproof glass wrap around under it works?

03/06/2016 - 23:54 |
1 | 0
in_cognito

Just terrible… It looks terrible, I see a lot of unprotected area for debris and it just looks ill conceived. F1 is dead, I’ll stick with BTCC.

03/07/2016 - 00:54 |
1 | 0