Do you prefer torquey or revvy engines? Explain!

Sponsored Posts

Comments

Anonymous

Low end because I drive a truck

04/05/2016 - 17:39 |
1 | 0
On the Apex

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

Makes sense! Lots of towing prowess!

04/05/2016 - 17:40 |
0 | 0
ElTiooJonny (#404GermanNotFound)

Torque cuz

  1. Clutch in
  2. Rev it
  3. Clutch out
  4. And slide it all about
04/05/2016 - 17:45 |
2 | 0

Well, you need some revs to do this.

04/05/2016 - 17:47 |
1 | 0
Julius Angerer

Torquey engines cause they feel faster when you acelerate

04/05/2016 - 17:46 |
1 | 0

They do because the torque wil “pull” the car much more strongly. Shame that revs are inversely proportional to TQ

04/05/2016 - 17:51 |
0 | 0
CitigoMan

Rotary. 10000RPM Bro

04/05/2016 - 17:50 |
1 | 0

BRAP BRAP TSUTUTUTU

04/05/2016 - 17:50 |
0 | 0
Drew Pera

I can’t decide on one over the other. I love high revving engines and the beautiful sound they make when screaming near the limit, but I love the big low end power of a large displacement engine because it’s so fun to just mash the throttle and have that instant gratification.

04/05/2016 - 17:50 |
2 | 0

A nicely balanced one! Feel somewhat the same.

04/05/2016 - 17:52 |
0 | 0
Ben Morton

Revvy, because rotary powwwer

04/05/2016 - 18:10 |
1 | 0

The 787B approves!

04/05/2016 - 18:13 |
0 | 0
Anonymous

torquey

04/05/2016 - 18:13 |
1 | 0
On the Apex

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

Got any reasons for the preference?

04/05/2016 - 18:17 |
0 | 0
Anonymous

I’m a rev junkie and love high rev monsters like that spoon civic that went all the way to like 10000rpms and love the fact that the jdm ej20 hit the 8000rpm range

04/05/2016 - 18:19 |
1 | 0
On the Apex

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

Nice! Have you seen an Evo tuned to 12k rpms?

04/05/2016 - 18:29 |
0 | 0
Anonymous

muffled eurobeat playing in the distance

04/05/2016 - 18:25 |
2 | 0
On the Apex

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

Dat reference tho

04/05/2016 - 18:27 |
0 | 0
On the Apex

[DELETED]

04/05/2016 - 18:28 |
0 | 0