Do you prefer torquey or revvy engines? Explain!

Sponsored Posts

Comments

Anonymous

Revvy n/a engines with high specific output. N/A engine desing is all about harmony, working in the limits of nature and that’s why i respect it more.

04/05/2016 - 18:29 |
1 | 0
On the Apex

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

Interesting. To get high revs you really need some precision engineering.

04/05/2016 - 18:31 |
0 | 0
DL🏁

A lot of people say that torque is the most important characteristic, but now, having been living with a 380Nm engine with 5k rpm redline, I really start to miss high-revving engines. They are so much more fun

04/05/2016 - 18:33 |
1 | 0

Agreed. In terms of practicallity and weight hauling torque is king, but a revvy N/A feels so much happier.

04/05/2016 - 18:34 |
0 | 0
ElTiooJonny (#404GermanNotFound)

that’s why there are a lot of LS on the FD cars, and another drift cars

04/05/2016 - 19:25 |
1 | 0
Lamborghini SV

Revvy. Because sound matters more to me than torque.

04/05/2016 - 20:06 |
5 | 0

Straightforward like few others

04/05/2016 - 20:11 |
1 | 0
Henrique Lopes

torque cause offroad

04/05/2016 - 20:07 |
1 | 0

Getting into some mud feels very good! :D

04/05/2016 - 20:13 |
1 | 0
On the Apex

[DELETED]

04/05/2016 - 20:11 |
0 | 0
DeLeon

Both. Or both combined. I love instant throttle response of NA engines but I also love it when the turbo kicks in. But torque is always good. Twin charged engines are a pretty nice thing (turbocharged and supercharged).

04/05/2016 - 20:28 |
1 | 0
On the Apex

In reply to by DeLeon

Why not both is always best! :)

04/05/2016 - 20:42 |
0 | 0
der_luidy

For offroad an low rpm diesel.
For any other things an high revving petrol :3

04/05/2016 - 20:32 |
1 | 0

Well chosen my friend! :D

04/05/2016 - 20:43 |
0 | 0
Joe Casad

I prefer high reving engines just because I love listening to them

04/05/2016 - 22:49 |
1 | 0

This is what music sounds like. Period.

04/05/2016 - 22:57 |
0 | 0
tdotroopnarine

Torquey

04/06/2016 - 00:52 |
1 | 0

Any reasons?

04/06/2016 - 00:54 |
0 | 0